Twenty five years ago two young professors at the Institute
for Behavioral Genetics began a longitudinal adoption study in Colorado.
However, John Defries
and Robert
Plomin probably did not imagine that a quarter century later they
would be presiding over an ongoing study which has enrolled more than
2,400 individuals, tracking the development of children from infancy to
adulthood. At the time, they thought a prospective adoption study
of normal development could resolve many questions about the relative
roles of cultural and biological influence, but were uncertain about cooperation
from adoption agencies and the likelihood of funding. Fortunately,
the director of one of Denver's agencies was enthusiastic about participating
in the study and the University of Colorado
provided some initial financial support. During the ensuing 25 years
the Colorado Adoption Project (CAP) has been supported by multiple grants
from the William T. Grant Foundation
, the Spencer Foundation , the
National Science Foundation, and the National
Institutes of Mental Health , Child
Health and Human Development , and Drug
Abuse .
In 1976, CAP staff began recruiting birth mothers (and fathers if possible)
through Denver Catholic and Lutheran Social Services, the two largest adoption
agencies in the Rocky Mountain region. These parents completed a
three-hour battery of psychological measures, many of which were based
on an earlier large-scale study of parents and children, the Hawaii Family
Study of Cognition. In order to avoid influencing the adoption process,
adoptive parents were approached by the agency social workers after the
adoption was complete. The willing adoptive parents then completed
the same measures as the birth parents. A control group was recruited
through area hospitals and matched on the basis of family demographics.
The first assessments of the children were begun in 1977 when the oldest
CAP probands were one-year olds.
Annual home visits were scheduled for all CAP probands and their younger
siblings through age four. Follow-up phone calls to the parents kept
the investigators in touch with the families at ages five and six.
Then in 1983, we began testing children in the laboratory after they had
completed first grade. During the next stage of the CAP, a novel
assessment was developed to conduct tests over the phone with both parents
and the children at ages 9, 10, and 11. Although experimental at
the time, this method has been very successful, enabling the investigators
to collect useful data in a way that is both cost-effective and less burdensome
for participating families. The children were then tested in the
laboratory at 12 years and again by phone at ages 13, 14, and 15.
Perhaps most importantly, the three-hour test battery previously administered
to the biological, adoptive, and control parents was administered to the
probands at age 16 as well as to all of their siblings, both younger and
older. Thus, the CAP had come full circle, with children completing
in late adolescence the same test battery their parents had completed 16
years earlier.
To provide only one example of the many results that have been obtained
from the CAP, in a paper ("Nature, nurture, and cognitive development from
1-16 years: A parent-offspring adoption study") published in 1997
in Psychological Science, Plomin, Fulker, Corley and DeFries reported
that children increasingly resemble their parents in cognitive abilities
from infancy through adolescence. Adopted children resemble their
adoptive parents slightly in early childhood but not at all in middle childhood
or adolescence. In contrast, during childhood and adolescence, adopted
children become more like their biological parents and to the same degree
as children and parents in nonadoptive families. These findings indicate
that genes that affect cognitive abilities in adulthood do not all come
into play until after adolescence and that environmental factors that contribute
to differences in cognitive development are not correlated with parents'
cognitive ability.
The project would undoubtedly be regarded as a landmark study in child
development if it had ended at this point. However, data collection
in new domains and at older ages is ongoing. Via telephone we interview
the CAP adolescents on substance experimentation and use, and conduct detailed
in-person interviews regarding psychological development at ages 17 and
21. Recently, Avshalom
Caspi , a renowned social demographer at the Institute of Psychiatry
in London, has become a collaborator and leads a new component of the study
in which we conduct telephone interview regarding adult life-choices at
ages 18-30, again with both probands and all of their siblings.
The founding investigators were ably assisted in the early stages by
Steven Vandenberg who had previously initiated the Louisville Twin Study.
In 1983, David Fulker
joined the faculty at IBG and the CAP team. John
Hewitt became a co-investigator in 1992 and now directs some components
of the study, as does Robin
Corley who has also been the CAP data manager since 1987.
A diverse group of researchers continues to analyze this rich data set,
both by exploring data collected many years ago in new ways and by contemporary
analysis of current data. Today, 25 years after its beginning,
the CAP is a remarkably productive project with over 150 publications,
including three volumes on the CAP, chapters in edited books, and articles
in peer-reviewed journals on topics ranging from the first "Assortative
mating by unwed biological parents of adopted children," (Plomin, DeFries,
& Roberts) published in Science in 1977 to the recent "Genetics
of cognitive abilities and disabilities," (Plomin & Defries) published
in Scientific American in 1998.
Sally
Ann Rhea
2001
Colorado Adoption Project Coordinator
1984 to present
return to top