User Tools

Site Tools


erds:health_status_report

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
erds:health_status_report [2020/07/24 16:15]
corley
erds:health_status_report [2020/07/30 09:21] (current)
corley
Line 5: Line 5:
 **Last updated 23-Jul-2020** **Last updated 23-Jul-2020**
  
-The health measures were collected using different instruments at the various sites. Only height and weight data available from Scandinavia. Query whether other information is available+The health measures were collected using different instruments at the various sites. Only height and weight data available from Scandinavia. Query whether other information was collected.
  
 There are four main components:   There are four main components:  
Line 19: Line 19:
   - Information about past year accidents, illnesses, and other health problems at each wave (see initial CO form) {{erds:twinprek_health.pdf|IT form}}       - Information about past year accidents, illnesses, and other health problems at each wave (see initial CO form) {{erds:twinprek_health.pdf|IT form}}    
       * In CO: from health forms for each age (maternal report)       * In CO: from health forms for each age (maternal report)
-      * In AUS: IT not collected separately from cumulativeF1-F3 from HealthF1,HealthF2, & HealthF3.sav files. See intake form here: {{erds:AUS_background.doc|AUS Intake}}+      * In AUS: At IT, no past year form separate from the pre-K cumulative tblParentInfo.xlsx; F1-F3 from HealthF1,HealthF2, & HealthF3.sav files. See intake form here: {{erds:AUS_background.pdf|AUS Intake}}
       * In SCAN: No information located       * In SCAN: No information located
   - Information about height and weight (IT-F4), plus birth weight and Apgar scores, plus zygosity (& source)     - Information about height and weight (IT-F4), plus birth weight and Apgar scores, plus zygosity (& source)  
Line 28: Line 28:
 In addition, some information about problems apparent during testing were collated from tester reports, with the idea that they might be useful for explaining within-family (particularly MZ) differences Here is a copy of meeting notes in Australia in 2007 where the idea was discussed: {{erds:aus_major_health_notes.pdf|Discordancies}} In addition, some information about problems apparent during testing were collated from tester reports, with the idea that they might be useful for explaining within-family (particularly MZ) differences Here is a copy of meeting notes in Australia in 2007 where the idea was discussed: {{erds:aus_major_health_notes.pdf|Discordancies}}
  
-These data were entered for F3 in CO as post2healthcodes2-08.xlsx, and included categories for  Allergies, Emotional or Behavioral, Medical or Physical, Family issues, Prenatal or Birth Conditions, and School IssuesOne family code and one school code could be entered per child. However, many of these codes are common to both twins. The specific codes for each category are listed in this Word document: {{erds:rdshealthcode2-08.doc|Health codes}}. +Family and school issue data were entered for F3 in CO as post2healthcodes2-08.xlsx. Up to three family codes and three school codes could be entered per child. However, many of these codes are common to both twins, rather than child-specific. Numerical codes for these categories:  Allergies, Emotional or Behavioral, Medical or Physical, Family issues, Prenatal or Birth Conditions, and School Issues are listed in this Word document: {{erds:rdshealthcode2-08.doc|Health codes}}.
  
-Although equivalent coded data has not been located for Australia, the tester ratings entered by Rosemary include tester notes which serve a similar purpose. I believe we can compile notes into a text-based summary file of issues that may suggest reasons twins are discrepant.+Equivalent coded data has not been located for Australia. I examined tester comments entered by Rosemary to see if similar material was noted, but notes did not seem to cover non-test-session material.
  
 **Open Questions**   **Open Questions**  
Line 39: Line 39:
    - Are there any other data that should be incorporated into the health file?       - Are there any other data that should be incorporated into the health file?   
       * **None identified** from inspection of Emily Bullen, Luisa Livingstone, and Robyn Mansfield theses       * **None identified** from inspection of Emily Bullen, Luisa Livingstone, and Robyn Mansfield theses
 +      * **Reading Problems/Diagnoses** In CO, have F1-F4 files with Reading Problems and Other Comments (which includes information about therapies & repeating grades). Should this information go into the Health file?
 +
  
 ==== What appears to be missing ==== ==== What appears to be missing ====
Line 44: Line 46:
   - From AUS: Past year data on accidents, illnesses, allergies at IT (wrapped into cumulative problems?)   - From AUS: Past year data on accidents, illnesses, allergies at IT (wrapped into cumulative problems?)
   - From AUS: Coded set of individual child issues explaining discrepant twin performance   - From AUS: Coded set of individual child issues explaining discrepant twin performance
-  - From CO: Complete set of individual child codes for later-tested children. 
   - From SCAN: Birth complications   - From SCAN: Birth complications
   - From SCAN: Information on cumulative health issues at time of IT   - From SCAN: Information on cumulative health issues at time of IT
   - From SCAN: Past year data of accidents, illnesses, allergies IT-F4   - From SCAN: Past year data of accidents, illnesses, allergies IT-F4
   - From SCAN: Codes for individual children to explain discrepant twin performance   - From SCAN: Codes for individual children to explain discrepant twin performance
erds/health_status_report.1595628936.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2020/07/24 16:15 by corley