This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
keller_and_evans_lab:gscan [2016/06/16 11:20] scott |
keller_and_evans_lab:gscan [2016/10/24 16:25] scott |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
The analysis plan and phenotypes are described in files linked below (makes it easier to keep track of versioning!). Coding of phenotypes is described in the aptly-named " | The analysis plan and phenotypes are described in files linked below (makes it easier to keep track of versioning!). Coding of phenotypes is described in the aptly-named " | ||
- | {{file_gscan_gwas_analysis_plan-v1_2.pdfClick | + | {{file_gscan_gwas_analysis_plan-v1_3.docxClick |
{{file_gscan_gwas_phenotype_definitions-2-24-2016.pdfClick here to find the GSCAN GWAS phenotype definitions.}} | {{file_gscan_gwas_phenotype_definitions-2-24-2016.pdfClick here to find the GSCAN GWAS phenotype definitions.}} | ||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
On RC the organization is similar. Everything is located within the folder / | On RC the organization is similar. Everything is located within the folder / | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====== [[gscan_db_ga_p]] & UK Biobank ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Studies included from dbGaP, and the process by which phenotypes and genotypes were constructed and merged is outlined on the [[gscan_db_ga_p]] page. | ||
Line 61: | Line 66: | ||
====== TOPMed ====== | ====== TOPMed ====== | ||
- | Preliminary phenotype | + | |
+ | ===== Phenotype | ||
+ | |||
+ | Phenotype definitions and analysis plans for the TOPMed | ||
The list of dbGaP studies in TOPMed is in [[https:// | The list of dbGaP studies in TOPMed is in [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ======= Authorship guidelines ======= | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | While authorship is decided on an individual basis for each paper (depending on contribution), | ||
+ | |||
+ | * A group of 6 or fewer junior investigators who strongly led the efforts, usually starred to denote equal contribution, | ||
+ | * In alphabetical order, junior investigators who had substantial individual contributions but not as much as those in Group 1. Typically, these might be lead analysts or other junior investigators who made a sizable contribution such as GWA analyses performed specifically for the paper. | ||
+ | * In alphabetical order, junior investigators who had notable individual contributions but not as much as those in Groups 1 or 2. Typically, these might be lead analysts for replication cohorts, providing results for a group of top hits. | ||
+ | * In alphabetical order, junior and senior investigators who had contributions worthy of authorship (participating in analysis, phenotype collection, genotyping, oversight of cohorts, etc. that was specific to the paper) but not as much as those in the other groups. | ||
+ | * In alphabetical order, senior investigators who had contributions worthy of authorship and contributed more than those in group 4. Typically, these might be a lead PI of a participating cohort who did not participate as strongly in GSCAN activities as those in group 6. | ||
+ | * In alphabetical order, senior investigators who participated strongly in GSCAN activities but did not strongly lead/ | ||
+ | * The senior investigators who strongly led/oversaw the writing and/or analysis of the paper, including a subset that are co-corresponding authors (usually 6 or fewer). | ||